Post Traumatic Stress - a cognitive approach
Post Traumatic Stress is generally the
result of a person being exposed to traumatic events which the person
cannot cope with. It has been first diagnosed in Vietnam Soldiers but
obviously the issue itself existed before but unrecognized. The trauma
itself can be triggered off by any event the person affected cannot
comprehend or make sense of. Examples of such events are accidents,
terror assaults, rape, abuse, hospitalization, seeing a ghost (not that
they exist, but someone might make us want to believe this and dresses
up as a ghost) or the sudden change in a person who had been close to
us (death, dementia or sudden violent behavior). The point is that it
is triggered of by something which is beyond anything we can
comprehend. This means, someone who expects abuse will probably not
suffer from post traumatic stress while a person who does not expect
it, will suffer from it.
What happens next is that this person will
attempt to make sense of it and this has three effects. As the mind is
constantly trying to make sense of it, the person affected by pts will
be very tried. The second effect is that because the person cannot make
sense of it, the person will be hypertense. Thirdly, because neither
the thoughts make sense nor the combination of being tired and
hypertense, the person will be in fear.
The symptoms are fairly well understood
and include nightmares, raising heart beat, shaking, tiredness,
exaggerated startle response (jumpiness), loss of motivation and sex
drive and avoidance reactions. This is, the person will avoid anything
which reminds this person of the traumatic event. If not treated
properly, the person will become reclusive, possibly alcoholic, will
start to stutter and be paranoid. However, so my claim, the treatment
of pts is not well understood at all, and many people affected by it go
through a period of unnecessary suffering.
In my opinion it is no good to prescribe
medication which controls the heart beat. The use of sedatives is
necessary. Why? Because, the affected person is stressed during the day
and then gets even more stressed during the night because of
nightmares. Patients need to be put into controlled periods of induced
coma (maybe for several days at a time) where they rest and where the
hypertension can dip down to normal levels. The patient has to be
supervised when coming out of a coma because the initial
disorientation adds to the stress. Recreational drugs such as
hallucinogens (e.g. LSD) must under no circumstances be used. Alcohol
is a sedative but highly addictive. Self-medication ought to be
avoided. During the periods of awaking the patients have to be
psychologically supervised in the following manner:
- Deconditioning: This is, the patient has to learn to face again
the things (s)he fears. If this, for instance, is the sound of gun
fire, (s)he has to be re-introduced to the sound and learn that this is
safe. Another instance is to return to the place where the traumatic
event took place.
- Forced regression: This is, the patient has to try to remember
things from the past which made the patient feel good. If this is
sleeping with cutely toys, fine so, be it. If it is building model
boats, fine too. Anything which the patient enjoyed especially from
childhood (if the childhood was not too traumatic itself). If the
trauma occurred during childhood, childhood has to be avoided, until
the patient can be deconditioned about the childhood trauma.
Psychotherapy is the worst thing a traumatized patient can go through
because it adds to the fear rather reduce it.
- Re-Motivation: The patient needs to be encouraged to return to
doing things the patient enjoyed before the trauma had taken place.
This is not an easy process, because the patient is convinced that this
will not work. If we talk about an exclusive childhood trauma,
the patient should focus on the good things which happened after
childhood and brought back to childhood at a point when the patient
feels safe. Psychoanalysts are playing with fire. How do they know how
a patient will cope when send back to childhood without the appropriate
safety?
- Interrupting automatic thoughts: As the patient is trying to make
sense of what happened, the patient is preoccupied thinking about the
traumatic event. The patient has to be encouraged to interrupt such
thoughts from time to time and with increasing frequency.
- Additional stress has to be avoided, especially from family,
relatives and friends. Quite often they are secondarily traumatized and
might need help too. Financial burdens have to be taken off the patient.
- Sympathy and Reassurance: The patient needs to be listened to
when the patient wishes to and feel sympathy and reassurance, that this
event was an exception and will not reoccur again. This can be a very
difficult task especially if the trauma was stretched over a long
period of time. I have been approached by a sufferer who reported that
she had been raped by her boyfriend on a daily basis between the age of
13 to 16. At the age of 30 she still suffers from black-outs and the
inability to recognize her husband.The patient also can profit from
knowing how to protect her/himself in the future (e.g. a rape victim
ought to learn self-defense techniques).
Once the patient has learned to
re-engage in normal life, the sedation has to be decreased and this is
the time when the patient will experience a certain amount of
nightmares but can cope with those nightmares because regular life has
returned. The dreams ought to be talked about (not in a
psychoanalytical way, but in a Freudian fashion) until the patient
feels that (s)he can makes sense of these dreams. If these nightmares
are too heavy and interfere with the daily
routines, the patient needs to be sedated again with the reassurance
that things will return back to normal. Eventually, the nightmares will
disappear.
I would be grateful for any comments, ideas and corrections to this
approach.
Dr. Ludger Hofmann-Engl 15.03.06